Rechercher dans ce blog

Saturday, February 27, 2021

What It’s Like to Work With a Matchmaker - The New York Times

with.indah.link

With television shows like “Million Dollar Matchmaker” and “Indian Matchmaking,” and a pandemic that has made it harder for singles to meet organically, matchmaking is hot again. “There used to be this stigma around it,” said Eddie Hernandez, an online dating consultant in San Francisco. “Now a lot more people are asking me about it.”

And it’s not just the demand for matchmaking services that has gone up; there are also more companies on offer. “I would say there are double the number in the Bay Area alone from five years ago,” he added. “I get pitches from new ones all the time, and they are getting very specific. They say, ‘I am a Jewish matchmaker, I am an Indian matchmaker.’”

Some matchmakers charge a hefty sum — some require $100,000, or even $250,000 — but the industry, as a whole, lacks transparency. Many matchmakers either don’t have or won’t share statistics on their success rates. It’s common not to provide references, citing a need to protect privacy. The companies generally aren’t listed on review sites like Yelp. “When there are reviews, it’s hard to tell what is honest and what is not,” said Mr. Hernandez. “A lot of the authors are people a matchmaker asked to be in their database for free, rather than being a paying client, and that is a very different experience.”

We interviewed a few singles across North America who have used matchmakers. We asked them what they paid, what they got for their money, and how the service worked. Could they negotiate their fees? Did they get the type of matches they were asking for? Would they recommend the service to a friend? Here are edited versions of five conversations, including some comments and responses from the matchmakers.

Matchmaker: The Social: Modern Matchmaking.

Fee: $2,500 for six months. There is no guaranteed number of dates. (“My pricing is pretty flexible depending on what a client is looking for, how many dates they want to go on and how much coaching they need,” said Abby Rosenblum, the founder of the company.)

Time Period: August through the present.

Why a matchmaker? I had been doing a lot of online dating that hadn’t resulted in anything. My hope was that a matchmaker could find me a different crowd, and because of the financial investment required, the men would be committed to finding a partner.

How did you find your matchmaker? I went to a meet-up online about how to improve your online dating profile, and the woman presenting was a matchmaker. We had an initial conversation, and she seemed to be open and accepting; we had a good rapport. I asked to speak to a past client who didn’t find her match; I needed to know that, if it didn’t work out, the money would still be worth it. She connected me with one.

How does the dating part work? She sends a text to both of us saying meet at this location at this time. We don’t get pictures before the date. I find it helpful not to have any preconceived notions.

How have they been? I’ve been on six dates. None of them have felt like a waste of time; they are all people who want to find a partner. On one date I was a little confused because he was outside of the age range I gave. When we talked about it later my matchmaker convinced me to be open-minded about age. I am in the process of setting up a second date with one match.

Is it worth the money? I’m benefiting from some of her other offerings. For example, she set me up with a wingman, basically a fake date who gave me feedback. He pointed out that I had my arms crossed, and I wasn’t necessarily expressing some of the sensual energy a male would want to receive. That perspective is worth the money. My expectation is that this is more about personal growth than finding a match.

Matchmaker: Ambiance Matchmaking.

Fee: $15,000 for 12 matches in one year. (Taylor Wade, a founder and the creative director of the company, said: “That was 2020 pricing. We have different customized programs as clients’ needs vary.” The 2021 prices vary from $25,000 to $100,000 based on how many matches requested and the locations you choose to date.)

Time Period: September 2020 through the present.

Why a matchmaker? I am getting fewer online matches during the pandemic. Someone on Reddit mentioned this matchmaking service, so I decided to look into it.

Did you do research before signing? I looked at other services, and I saw that the prices were in the same ballpark. The price range I saw was $500 to $1,500 per match, and typically it would be one match a month. So I decided to go with the one that I had a recommendation for. They also had reviews on Yelp that seemed pretty positive.

What were your first impressions? I applied, and their first response was they weren’t sure they could find matches for my age in my area. They said if I was willing to look for matches in the Bay Area, they could find more people. I said OK. My location is more flexible now that remote forever is becoming a thing.

I did successfully negotiate though. I told them I would pay for three matches upfront, and then the other nine after that if I was happy. (Ms. Wade said negotiation is not typical. “We customized this program for this client as he had very unique specifications that were above and beyond normal matchmaking requirements.”)

How is it going? The quality of the matches has been notably better than matches from Tinder. I went on three dates with my first match after deciding we didn’t have enough mutual interests to continue the relationship.

The only requirement I gave my matchmaker (aside from the standard red flags) is that the woman should have an interest in video games and Animae. The first match had weak interest; the second, none at all. My matchmaker asked me if there were niche communities out there where she could find people. I was fine with that, because I know this world better. Messaging strangers in a subreddit is not something I want to do, but I am fine with her doing it.

Any worries? My contract says I am supposed to go on one date per month, but I went on one in September, one in November, and none since. They give me updates that they are searching for people. I think after three or four months if there was not much explanation to why I have no dates, that would start being unreasonable.

Is the money worth it? The real question is how much time I would spend without using this service looking for a date. I estimate that to be 50 hours, so I am willing to spend a thousand dollars per date to not have to do that work.

(Because of various circumstances, including pandemic-related issues and Mr. Drissi’s expected move to San Francisco, candidates for a third date are now being screened, “now that we know where he will be based,” Ms. Wade said. “If a match isn’t made, for whatever reason, we always make it up to the client. His contract states that his agreement may extend beyond three months at no additional cost if his three matches have not been completed.”)

Matchmaker: Friend of a Friend Matchmaking.

Fee: $250 (Canadian dollars) for three dates over a year.

Time Period: 2017-2018.

How did you decide on your matchmaker? I looked into high-end matchmaking services, but they seemed wildly expensive. My concern would be that the women who sign up for a service like that would be used to a crazy, lavish lifestyle, and that’s probably not someone I am compatible with.

Friend of a Friend was owned by someone I tangentially knew through social media, and I knew people who had found matches through it. I also liked that she was someone local with local connections who was just trying to be a yenta.

How did the company get to know you? There was an intake form, and then I met one of her staff at a local coffee shop. We talked for hours.

Did you find somebody? The introductions were better than the average Tinder match. One girl I went on a date or two. Another I went on five or six dates. But they all fizzled out.

Would you use a matchmaker again? I don’t have the confidence that a second try would result in a better outcome. I might get three more above average prospects, but I am not looking for that. I am looking for “the one.” I’m convinced a matchmaker has the same chance of finding me that person as a mutual friend who also knows people I don’t know.

Were you disappointed in the outcome? I didn’t have the highest expectations, and for the amount of money I paid, I felt like it was very low stakes. I think if I was spending a lot more money I would feel differently.

Matchmaker: It’s Just Lunch

Fee: $1,000. The service said the time period can vary from 3 to 12 months.

Time Period: January through the present.

How did you find this matchmaker? My brother signed me up as a gift. He first signed me up for a Jewish dating service.I heard it was for religious Jews, but they promised they could find me someone less observant. When all the matches were kosher and super, super conservative I freaked out and got my brother a refund. It’s Just Lunch is my second attempt with matchmaking. (Note: Maggie did not give her last name because her work with the matchmaker is ongoing.)

I told a representative from the service my dating history and what I was looking for. Then they assigned me to a matchmaker. Usually you get three dates in person, but because of Covid, they are also offering unlimited Zoom dates.

How was your first Zoom date? I stressed to them that I needed someone outgoing, but my first date was someone who was shy, which was the exact opposite. I wish they would give us an icebreaker, maybe 10 questions to ask each other.

I also told my matchmaker I wanted a guy who likes to ski or snowboard. But when she set me up on this date, and I asked if he skis, she said, “I don’t know. I didn’t ask him.”

What happened after the date? When the date was over they ask you to send in a form about how things went. Initially they told me they would pass along the feedback he had for me, but when I asked for it, my matchmaker said it was confidential.

I really want the feedback, because I don’t normally get second dates when I go out with people. I feel like there is some sort of vibe I am putting out there, and I would very much like to nip that in the bud.

It took them a few weeks to schedule the second date. It feels like they set me up with this shy guy because they don’t have that many other options.

(Jeaneen Bengston, a spokeswoman for the service said: “We do request feedback from our clients after every date. We do not share date feedback with the match. We use the feedback to refine the matching process and provide dating coaching to our clients.”)

What would success look like? If I end up seeing someone out of this. It’s tough right now because I am not really seeing people, and every time I go on Bumble I get discouraged. So this feels like my last-ditch effort. I am trying to stay positive, but I am also not really getting my hopes up from what I’ve seen so far.

[Sign up for Love Letter and always get the latest in Modern Love, weddings, and relationships in the news by email.]

Matchmaker: Selective Search

Fee: $25,000 for a year. She gets four in-person dates. (Barbie Adler, the founder of the company, said memberships begin at $25,000, but vary based on the specific needs of each client and the complexity of the search.)

Timing: January 2018 to May 2020. She paid for two years.

Why did you turn to a matchmaker? I felt I needed a quality person to share my life with, and I felt like I needed to engage a professional to help me accomplish that. I didn’t want to leave it to chance, and I recognize men in my age bracket tend to go for much younger women. I told myself it may or may not work, but I owe myself to at least try. (Note: Susan did not give her last name because of privacy concerns.)

Why this one? I signed up with another matchmaking company earlier, but I thought it was a bit of a scam because they took my money, made all kinds of promises, but never delivered. They presented the names of gentlemen, but none were even close to the type of person I was looking for. After that I knew I needed to up my game.

Selective Search costs way more than the other company, but there is a saying, you get what you pay for. I liked that the founder used to be an executive recruiter. I figured she knew how to find people.

What were the first steps? The company’s vice president of client relations flew to my city to have lunch with me, and we spoke for four hours. They told me up front it would be two to three months before I had my first date. They had to do due diligence and do the research. I also had to get a professional headshot, and we even went over outfit options.

How were the quality of the dates? Over two years I received 21 profiles of gentlemen, and I met eight in person. Everyone was educated, professional, the right age group. It was the personal connection you cannot vouch for. I flew to Houston to meet one man. He had impeccable credentials; he went to Harvard and MIT and was a successful businessman, but he had an ego taller than the Empire State Building. I went to Washington D.C., to meet another, but he didn’t know what he wanted.

My matchmaker was very methodical, and she had a pipeline. When I met someone, and it fell through, it didn’t take her very long to get to the next one.

Date 8, who I started talking to in June 2020, I knew was going to work right away. He lives about three miles from my house, but we never would have met. Our social circles were completely separate. Now we are on the path to marriage.

Matchmaker: Matchmaking by Leslie

Fee: She paid $450 to get six dates within a year. He did not pay. (The service now charges $600 for six dates plus a $50 consultation fee for the first meeting.)

Time Period: July 2013

How did you find your matchmaker? I had been divorced about a year earlier, and I was ready to start dating. Leslie Cohen Fargotstein, the matchmaker, is a friend of mine and she was over at my house, telling me about her business plan and all the ideas she had. I said, “Sign me up, I’ll be your first client.” She had no track record, but she was always talking about love and how she wanted to bring it to people.

Note: Ms. Feinstone and Mr. Cohen met in August 2013 and married in November 2017. Mr. Cohen already knew of the matchmaker, who is not related to him, because her husband had been the coach of his son’s youth baseball team.

How does the dating part work? She told me that she knew the perfect guy for me, but he had only been divorced a few months and was not ready to date. She thought he was perfect for me though, so she arranged a scenario where we could meet. She invited both of us, along with another couple, to a performance at B.B. King’s on Beale Street. We hit it off enough to go to dinner the next week. He was my first match, and I didn’t go on another date after that.

“She really worked every angle,” said Mr. Cohen of their matchmaker. “She arranged a way where I would feel safe to meet someone new. She read the situation right and made it happen.”

Was it love at first sight? I told Leslie at the beginning that if I am going to do this, I am going to be open and listen to what you say. I think if I would have just gone on one date with Barry, we wouldn’t have gotten married. We were both so nervous. She said I have to go on at least three, maybe four dates to really get to know him, and it was around date four that we really got comfortable with each other and had a real conversation.

“It took us a while to get real with each other,” said Mr. Cohen.

Would you recommend it to others? I gave my friend a matchmaking session for her birthday.

Mr. Cohen said open-mindedness is key. “You can’t say I want someone this height or with this hair, because your search will be too narrow. You also have to trust your matchmaker,” he said. “I think if it’s a dating service that just makes matches from an algorithm, it wouldn’t have worked.”

Would you have met otherwise? Our paths would have never crossed. Barry’s company is in Boston and he travels a lot.

“I am sure we would have never met,” said Mr. Cohen. “But I’m so glad we did, because we are very happy.”

Continue following our fashion and lifestyle coverage on Facebook (Styles and Modern Love), Twitter (Styles, Fashion and Weddings) and Instagram.

The Link Lonk


February 27, 2021 at 05:00PM
https://ift.tt/2O6DoRj

What It’s Like to Work With a Matchmaker - The New York Times

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

Blazers Finish Trip 0-3 With Loss To Lakers - Trailblazers.com

with.indah.link

LOS ANGELES -- After going a perfect 3-0 on their previous road trip, the Portland Trail Blazers wrapped up a 0-3 road trip with a 102-93 loss to the Los Angeles Lakers Friday night at Staple Center.

“I don’t know if there’s a common thread among these last three games,” said Trail Blazers head coach Terry Stotts. “But tonight, they gave Dame a lot of attention, we didn’t shoot the ball particularly well from three, which we have relied on, we’ve had a couple poor shooting quarters. Our turnovers gave us trouble in the third quarter, which led to their transition.”

The Trail Blazers are now 18-14 overall and 10-8 on the road this season. The loss extends their losing streak to four games, their longest dry spell of the season thus far, and ends a four-game losing streak for the Lakers.

“I think the level of competition has been a little bit more stiff,” said Damian Lillard. “The three home games and the three game trip that we went on were all teams in the same boat as us, fighting for a spot in the Western Conference. A lot of talent, just not the same amount of experience. We were the more experienced team in those games and we were able to pull out tight games, because of our experience. Then you fast forward to the Phoenix game, Denver game and then tonight, it was just experience.”

After a first quarter in which they shot 50 percent from the field and led by as many as 11, the Trail Blazers had little success putting the ball in the basket in the remaining three quarters. Usually holding an opponent to 42 percent shooting from the field and 26 percent shooting from three would be good enough to keep a game close, but not against the Lakers Friday night.

Portland took a three-point lead into the half, but between turning the ball over seven times for 14 Lakers points and shooting just 1-of-4 from three in the third, they would be outscored by 12 in the quarter. The Blazers cleaned up the turnovers in the fourth, but with Lillard drawing double teams consistently and the rest of the team struggling to get shots to fall, a comeback never seemed feasible, let alone likely.

“Tonight was about our offense,” said Stotts. “There’s always room to improve defensively but tonight was about our offense. Lakers did a really good job of being aggressive on us, created turnovers in the third quarter and we weren’t able to capitalize on some of the looks that we did have.”

Lillard led the Blazers with 35 points, seven assists and three rebounds in 42 minutes. Gary Trent. Jr. finished with 19 points. Enes Kanter added 11 points and 17 rebounds in 35 minutes and Derrick Jones Jr. contributed 11 points, six rebounds, two blocks, two assists and a steal.

LeBron James led the Lakers with 28 points, 11 rebounds, seven assists, four steals and three blocks in 35 minutes. Dennis Schroder had 22 points and Montrezl Harrell scored 17 points off the bench.

Now the the Trail Blazers return home to play the last three games of the first half of their 2020-21 schedule, starting with a tilt Monday versus the Charlotte Hornets.

“We’ve lost four in a row, we’re coming home, we need to gain some momentum going into the break,” said Stotts. “I’m really confident about our group and how they compete and how important it is, so I don’t think we need to belabor the point. We know that these three games are important going into the break.”

Tipoff is scheduled for 7:30 p.m.

The Link Lonk


February 27, 2021 at 02:14PM
https://ift.tt/3b11nud

Blazers Finish Trip 0-3 With Loss To Lakers - Trailblazers.com

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

NASA Celebrates Mary W. Jackson With Building Naming Ceremony - NASA

with.indah.link
[unable to retrieve full-text content]NASA Celebrates Mary W. Jackson With Building Naming Ceremony  NASA The Link Lonk


February 27, 2021 at 05:51AM
https://ift.tt/3bHKP9t

NASA Celebrates Mary W. Jackson With Building Naming Ceremony - NASA

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

Friday, February 26, 2021

With Strikes in Syria, Biden Confronts Iran’s Militant Network - The New York Times

with.indah.link

BEIRUT, Lebanon — Since President Biden entered the White House, Iranian-backed militants across the Middle East have struck an airport in Saudi Arabia with an exploding drone, and are accused of assassinating a critic in Lebanon and of targeting American military personnel at an airport in northern Iraq, killing a Filipino contractor and wounding six others.

On Thursday, the world got its first glimpse of how Mr. Biden is likely to approach one of the greatest security concerns of American partners in the region: the network of militias that are backed by Iran and committed to subverting the interests of the United States and its allies.

United States officials said that overnight airstrikes ordered by Mr. Biden hit a collection of buildings on the Syrian side of a border crossing with Iraq on Thursday and targeted members of the Iran-backed militia Kataib Hezbollah and an affiliated group.

A Kataib Hezbollah official said that one of his group’s fighters had been killed in the airstrikes. A statement by the group later described the dead fighter as a member of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces, a collection of paramilitaries that includes Kataib Hezbollah and is officially part of Iraqi government security forces.

But Iranian state television and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a conflict monitor based in Britain, reported that 17 fighters had been killed in the airstrikes, which occurred near Abu Kamal, Syria, just across the border from Iraq.

While the exact death toll remained unclear, Mr. Biden appears to have calibrated the strikes, hoping they would cause enough damage to show that the United States would not allow rocket attacks like that on the Erbil airport in northern Iraq on Feb. 15, but not so much as to risk setting off a wider conflagration.

“He is kind of putting his first red line,” said Maha Yahya, the director of the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut.

She said the strikes signaled to Iran that his eagerness to return to a nuclear agreement would not lead Mr. Biden to ignore other regional activities by Iran and its allies, and particularly attacks on American troops.

“It is sending a message: The bottom line is that we won’t tolerate this and will use military force when we feel you’ve crossed the line,” Ms. Yahya said.

Militiamen fled from six of the seven buildings hit in the strikes after spotting what they believed to be an American surveillance aircraft, according to the Sabareen news channel on Telegram, which is used by Iran-backed groups.

In a sign of heightened tensions between the Iraqi government and Iran-backed groups that are also part of Iraq’s security forces, Sabareen said the U.S. strikes had been aided by an Iraqi intelligence official posing as a shepherd.

Iraq’s interior and defense ministries issued statements denying they had provided intelligence for the attack.

In an interview with a local television network on Thursday, Iraq’s foreign minister, Fuad Hussein, said those calling themselves “the resistance” and launching rocket attacks in Iraq were no more than terrorists.

Sabareen called Mr. Hussein’s comments “a green light to the international community to target and eliminate the resistance under the pretext of terrorism.”

“We see these attacks as attacks on the Iraqi government,” Mr. Hussein said in a recent interview with The New York Times, referring to attacks on the U.S. Embassy and other American targets. Mr. Hussein is one of several Iraqi officials who have traveled to Iran in recent months to try to persuade it to use its influence to rein in militia forces.

“I and others went to Tehran and had a frank and open discussion with the Iranians,” he said. “For a period of time, it stopped these attacks.”

“At the end, the field of conflict is in Iraq,” Mr. Hussein said.

Senior Iraqi officials have said they expect a more nuanced policy by the Biden administration toward Iraq. Mr. Hussein said Baghdad had no expectations that the administration would make Iraq a foreign policy priority, but said relations would be helped by the long experience of both Mr. Biden and key administration officials with Iraq and Iraqi politicians.

Kataib Hezbollah says it maintains a presence at the border crossing to prevent the infiltration of Islamic State fighters into Iraq. It called the U.S. strikes on the border a crime aided and abetted by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and said it reserved the right to respond. It also repeated calls for the Iraqi government to expel U.S. forces.

Kataib Hezbollah has denied responsibility for the attacks on Erbil airport this month that killed the military contractor and an Iraqi civilian.

The Iraqi government has struggled to rein in Iran-backed militias that have grown in influence since mobilizing to fight the Islamic State when it took over large parts of Iraq and Syria in 2014. The group lost its last piece of territory two years ago, and many of the Iran-backed paramilitary groups have been absorbed into Iraq’s official security forces.

Iraq has warned that conflict between the United States and Iran playing out on its soil threatens to destabilize the country.

Attacks on American interests in Iraq by suspected Iran-backed militias intensified after the United States killed an Iranian general, Qassim Suleimani, and a senior Iraqi security official, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, in a drone strike in Baghdad in 2020.

“In the last year, Iraq has become a playground and battleground for this type of activity driven by the U.S.-Iran escalation,” said Renad Mansour, the Iraq Initiative director at Chatham House, a London-based policy group. “These groups began to spring up after the killing.”

“There’s one clear message from all of them: that avenging the deaths isn’t over,” he said. “For them, time isn’t an issue.”

Mr. Mansour, who tracks armed groups in Iraq, said the newer groups appeared to be made up of fighters armed with weapons connected to the larger Iran-linked paramilitaries.

Some of the Iran-backed paramilitary groups are on the Iraqi government’s payroll as part of the Iraqi security forces but are only nominally under the control of the government.

The tit-for-tat attacks come as the Biden administration begins the daunting task of trying to restore the nuclear agreement with Iran that former President Donald J. Trump withdrew the United States from in 2018. Looming behind the question of the parameters of a new deal is the issue of Iran’s destabilizing activities across the Middle East, which are particularly concerning to American allies such as Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Iran has spent decades building a network of partnerships with militia groups across the region that has allowed it to project power far outside its area of influence. These groups include the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, a number of groups in Iraq and the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

All of these groups have received at least some financing, support and weaponry from Iran over the years, and all share its ideology of “resistance,” or the struggle against Israel and United States interests in the region.

The groups have developed numerous, often low-cost ways of creating headaches for America and its allies. Hezbollah has grown into Lebanon’s most powerful military and political force, with an arsenal of more than 100,000 rockets pointed at Israel and seasoned fighters who helped turn the tide in Syria’s civil war in favor of President Bashar al-Assad.

This month, the group’s foes in Lebanon accused the group of assassinating Lokman Slim, a publisher, filmmaker and vocal critic of the group who had close ties with Western officials. Hezbollah officials denied any connection to Mr. Slim’s killing.

Days after Mr. Slim’s death, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, whom an Arab coalition led by Saudi Arabia has been bombing since 2015, targeted an airport in the Saudi city of Abha with an explosive-laden drone, damaging a civilian airliner.

The Erbil rocket attack was claimed by a previously unknown armed group calling itself the Guardians of the Blood. United States officials said it appeared to be affiliated with one or more of Iraq’s better-known militias, and Thursday’s strikes in Syria targeted facilities belonging to them.

Ben Hubbard reported from Beirut, Lebanon, and Jane Arraf from Amman, Jordan. Falih Hassan contributed reporting from Baghdad.

The Link Lonk


February 26, 2021 at 08:35PM
https://ift.tt/37RRtJd

With Strikes in Syria, Biden Confronts Iran’s Militant Network - The New York Times

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

Texans Demand Answers as They Grapple With Storm’s Lingering Wrath - The New York Times

with.indah.link

HOUSTON — Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas has called for an overhaul of the agency that oversees the flow of electricity through much of the state. Prosecutors have initiated criminal investigations into power outages that affected millions of Texans. And several lawmakers have called for the chairwoman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas to resign, as energy officials were summoned to Austin for marathon hearings on what went wrong during last week’s destructive winter storm.

Over the past week, Texas has been gripped by a volley of accusations and blame after the powerful storm nearly collapsed the state’s power grid, leaving millions in dark and unheated homes during some of the most frigid temperatures recorded in state history.

The indignation displayed by state officials mirrored the anger and anguish of residents, who continued to seethe over feeling stranded without power during the storm, burst pipes wrecking their homes and astonishingly high electric bills that have some contemplating draining retirement accounts to pay them.

“I want someone held accountable,” said Toni Anderson, whose husband, Carrol, died in his truck outside their home in 19-degree weather.

In the days after the storm blanketed much of the state with snow and ice, resignations have been offered and lawsuits have been filed. The future of the power grid has been listed as a top priority in the State Legislature, and political and energy industry analysts have said the political will exists to pursue at least modest changes to how the energy industry is managed.

But many questioned how far state officials would be willing to go, beyond interrogating and finger-pointing.

“We’re going to hear lots of cheap talk over the next few months,” said Mark P. Jones, a professor of political science at Rice University. “But I’d look for concrete legislation that would change the rules of the game.”

There have been calls for stronger oversight, and some have questioned the wisdom of the go-it-alone, regulation-resistant approach to energy that Texas has long embraced. Researchers said the outages, which came as the storm pushed the power grid to the brink of collapse, showed that the state did not have sufficient reserves and that facilities had not been bolstered enough to endure winter conditions.

“The colossal failure of our power grid was not an unpredictable event — it was the result of unsustainable and reckless neglect by leadership,” the political arm of Deeds Not Words, a progressive advocacy group for women, said in a statement.

Governor Abbott quickly homed in on the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which oversees the power grid, when assigning blame. He said the council had “repeatedly assured” officials that it was prepared for winter weather. “Those assurances turned out to be false,” he said.

The council, known as ERCOT, was also the subject of criticism over having a governing board with several members who did not live in Texas. Five of those board members, including the chairwoman, resigned this week.

“Many of you are angry,” Mr. Abbott said in a televised address on Wednesday. “You have every right to be. I’m angry, too. At a time when essential services were needed the most, the system broke. You deserve answers. You will get those answers.”

In some ways, the timing of the disaster was fortuitous, coming just as the State Legislature, which gathers every other year, started its session. This week, a line of officials from ERCOT, the Public Utility Commission of Texas, energy executives, power providers and others faced a barrage of questions over the outages.

“Who turned my power off?” Todd Hunter, a nine-term Republican lawmaker from Corpus Christi, asked of energy officials during a hearing this week.

“Gentlemen, we’ve got a lot of people watching,” he said, adding, “Here’s the question I think most people want to ask you.” His voice rose. “Who’s at fault? I want the public to know who screwed up,” Mr. Hunter said. “I want names and details.”

Many lawmakers were unabashed in their criticism. “This is the largest train wreck in the history of deregulated electricity,” Senator Brandon Creighton, a Republican, told Bill Magness, the chief executive and president of ERCOT.

Mr. Magness acknowledged the devastation caused by the power outages, but in his testimony, he said that, even with the benefit of hindsight, ERCOT would not have acted differently. He said the grid was barreling toward a collapse — it was four minutes, 37 seconds away, to be exact, as demand surged and supply plummeted. The consequences of that, he said, would have been even more devastating.

“Now it didn’t work for people’s lives, but it worked to preserve the integrity of the system,” Mr. Magness said of the decisions made by grid operators, adding that if the system had completely failed, “We’d still be talking about how we’d get the power on.”

Disaster is no stranger to Texas, where hurricanes pummel the Gulf Coast, powerful tornadoes scrape the panhandle and wildfires scorch ranch land in the Hill Country. Even winter storms delivering snow and ice are nothing new.

But the level of consternation the recent winter storm has stirred in Texas has reflected the scale of the devastation as it swept across much of the state.

In the days since, much of Texas has returned to the kind of winter that residents are familiar with. Snow and ice have melted. In Houston, the highs have been pushing 80 degrees. Yet the storm’s consequences remain in the piles of wood and drywall left in front of houses with burst pipes. They are seen in the eager trades for plumbing equipment on social media and, in one community, at a local bar, with such items impossible to find in stores.

Valerie Williams was spared damage to her home, but she and her family were confronting an electric bill of $8,100. She had been one of the customers using services like Griddy, where the cost of electricity is tied to the fluctuating wholesale price. She had written to Mr. Abbott and had gotten no response.

“I was just suggesting to the governor that we get some answers,” said Ms. Williams, who lives in Burleson, a Fort Worth suburb, saying that she was hoping for relief, as the storm presented a situation she never anticipated and left her wary of state leaders.

“Honestly, I feel like we’ve lost faith in the people responsible for making sure we have what we need to be healthy and safe in our own homes,” she said. “That’s the hard part. Never did I think in Texas we couldn’t have what we needed, and unfortunately that’s how it is.”

District attorneys across the state have said they had started inquiries to determine whether anyone — including state officials, agencies and power companies — could be held criminally responsible for any part of the storm’s aftermath.

“We will not forget the horror our community experienced,” José Garza, the district attorney for Travis County, which includes Austin, said in a statement. “We will do everything we can to hold powerful actors, whose action or inaction may have led to this suffering, accountable.”

Lawyers also expect an avalanche of lawsuits that will rival the litigation that always comes after major hurricanes. “I think you’re going to see more litigation from this event, certainly more than Harvey and even more than Ike,” said Tony Buzbee, a lawyer in Houston.

For Ms. Anderson, the storm has not passed.

In her kitchen in Crosby, just outside of Houston, the drywall was soggy and the floors had buckled from the deluge that came from a burst pipe in the attic. Still, that was nothing compared to the gaping absence of her husband, who most likely went to his truck for a spare oxygen tank. His main tank ran on electricity, and the power had gone out the night before.

Ms. Anderson has filed a lawsuit against CenterPoint Energy, her power provider, arguing that outages that the company had described as rotating instead lasted for hours, leading to her husband’s decline. (CenterPoint said the company does not comment on litigation.)

Mr. Anderson had tried to plug in a vacuum into a generator to clean up the mess made by the burst pipe. He became exhausted and struggled to breathe. While he went outside for the spare oxygen tank, his wife continued mopping. She later found him slumped over his truck’s console.

Mr. Anderson, 75, was a Vietnam veteran who had kept the same job for decades with the Port Terminal Railroad Association. He could be a bit gruff, Ms. Anderson said. But when she called his old co-workers from the railroad, they told her stories of his kindness, how he had helped them out on the job.

“I saw him every day for 30 years, and now, all of the sudden, I’m in a house by myself,” Ms. Anderson, 75, said, her words punctuated by tears. “He should be here today.”

David Montgomery contributed reporting from Austin, Texas.

The Link Lonk


February 27, 2021 at 07:41AM
https://ift.tt/2P876Wo

Texans Demand Answers as They Grapple With Storm’s Lingering Wrath - The New York Times

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

FBI focuses on video of Capitol Police officer being sprayed with chemicals before he died in pro-Trump riot - The Washington Post

with.indah.link

Sicknick’s death has vexed investigators exploring the Jan. 6 riot, as they have struggled to figure out how precisely he died and whether someone could be held criminally accountable in connection with the death.

Investigators determined Sicknick did not die of blunt force trauma, people familiar with the matter said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation. U.S. Capitol Police in a statement Jan. 8 said that Sicknick died “due to injuries sustained while on duty.” No autopsy or toxicology report has been made public, unusual seven weeks after a death.

Capitol Police said in a statement Friday the medical examiner’s report was not yet complete, adding, “We are awaiting toxicology results and continue to work with other government agencies regarding the death investigation.”

The video could offer prosecutors a path to charging someone in connection with Sicknick’s death — though they still have to identify the assailant and would then have to establish that the spraying proved fatal. Prosecutors, instead, might consider bringing assault charges.

The FBI captured screenshots of people visible in the video, one person familiar with the matter said, and in the past month released the images publicly, hoping to identify them. The bureau did not mention Sicknick or depict the chemical spraying when distributing the images.

Spokespeople for the FBI and the Justice Department declined to comment. The new video was previously reported by CNN. The New York Times reported more of its contents on Friday.

Acting deputy attorney general John Carlin said Friday that prosecutors have now charged more than 300 people in connection with the Jan. 6 attack at the Capitol, when a mob supportive of President Donald Trump stormed passed barricades and sparred with police inside and outside the building. They have arrested more than 280, Carlin said.

Sicknick, a 42-year-old from South River, N.J., joined the Capitol Police in 2008. He was the sixth Capitol Police officer to die in the line of duty since 1952, and the fourth to be a victim of an attack on the Capitol grounds. Those who knew Sicknick said he was conservative and supported Trump, but his political views did not align neatly with one party.

Peter Hermann contributed to this report.

The Link Lonk


February 27, 2021 at 09:57AM
https://ift.tt/2NZZMeZ

FBI focuses on video of Capitol Police officer being sprayed with chemicals before he died in pro-Trump riot - The Washington Post

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

Larger Washington school districts struggle with classroom reopening plans - KING5.com

with.indah.link

About a third of students statewide have some form of in-person learning, which is behind many other states.

Washington state is falling behind the rest of the country for in-person instruction. That's the insinuation by conservative think tank Washington Policy Center.

The group says aggregate data shows the state's percentage of students in classrooms is among the lowest in the country.

"This is a crisis, an education crisis for the children of Washington State, it is time to correct the problems," says Liv Finne, who serves as the Director for the Center for Education for the Washington Policy Center. 

For most students, school has looked different for the past year, as districts held remote classes as a precaution against the COVID-19 pandemic. But many students have returned to in-person learning, at various levels, throughout the country and state, with precautions such as mask-wearing and social distancing to avoid passing the virus.

"The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) has said it is safe to reopen the schools without the teachers getting vaccinated," Finne said.

Finne points to data from burbio.com, which shows Washington at 47th in the US, with only 19.2% of students receiving some form of in-person instruction. Many states in the Upper Midwest and Southeast are at or near 100%, according to that site.

But the State's Superintendent of Public Instruction's tracking puts the number of students who attend in-person classes at 28.3% on a single day, and 33.1% of students are in-person weekly. Still, that is low when compared with other parts of the United States.

Gov. Jay Inslee and State Superintendent Chris Reykdal have put some pressure on schools to return to in-person learning.

Reykdal's Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction has $714 million in COVID-19 relief for schools, which is only available to districts with a plan to return.

In the past few weeks, Inslee has been touring schools that have had in-person learning to encourage other districts to see how it can be done without outbreaks.

While many districts have plans for some form of in-person learning, some of the larger districts in the state including Seattle, Shoreline, Kent, Lake Washington, and Shoreline have struggled to announce a plan for even the smallest children to return to class.

Late Friday, Seattle announced that intensive services pathways will return on March 8, and Pre-K on March 11, but still doesn't have any start date for kids in kindergarten or first grades. 

Seattle has signaled, as a district, that it is unlikely students in second grade and above will return this school year.

Highline pulled plans for a hybrid return earlier this week. Late Friday, administrators told parents via email it now has a tentative deal to return Pre-K, kindergarten, first-graders and students in the intensive academic center by March 11.  Grades 2 and 3 would return March 22 if a deal is finalized with the teachers union.

For some parents, the decision to return to in-person classrooms isn't simple.

"I want my kids to be back in school, and I want our lives to get back to normal," said Josephine Quigtar, a parent of two kids in the Renton School District.

But she says, at this point in the calendar year, she is torn about what may be the best course of action. 

"The risk to the kids, and the teachers, and the staff, still feels like it's too big to go back right now," said Quigtar. "It's a little late in the year, it's taken six months to find our rhythm and routine and schedule, and we've hit a stride and I think we should just stick with this."

Finne feels a bit stronger about returning and says the data across the country should be an impetus for the governor and OSPI to press districts to come up with a concrete plan.

"It's a shame and disgrace, we should all be embarrassed," she said.

The Link Lonk


February 27, 2021 at 12:03PM
https://ift.tt/3sDnpct

Larger Washington school districts struggle with classroom reopening plans - KING5.com

https://ift.tt/3d5QSDO

Featured Post

Montevallo in talks with potential tenants for Victory building - Shelby County Reporter - Shelby County Reporter

with.indah.link By EMILY SPARACINO / Staff Writer MONTEVALLO – Mayor Rusty Nix is set to enter into negotiations with potential restaura...

Popular Posts